Mystical, mysterious, descendants of Christ: the secret of those with IV blood group

Origin

The blood type, found in only 5% of people, was described in 1902 by researcher DeCastello. Scientists suggest that it appeared about 1000 years ago, and this did not happen as a result of adaptation to changing living conditions.

The origin of this blood group is still one of the unsolved mysteries of the evolutionary process. The most popular hypothesis says that it appeared as a result of marriages between Indo-Europeans and Mongoloids. Such unions are quite rare, which explains the fact that people with the fourth group remain in the minority.

Talents

It is not for nothing that people with a rare blood type are credited with mystical abilities. These individuals are from birth endowed with unusually developed intuition, which helps them predict events. They also have an internal magnetism that helps them charm others. They easily manage to gain the trust of others and find loyal friends.

We decorate ordinary fabric organizers. It turns out stylish and unusual

Purple hair is the dream of mysterious beauties: a selection of spectacular images

You can also have sweets: a nutritionist said that it’s not harmful to eat sweets in the morning

Another advantage of having a rare blood type is an analytical mind. These people are able to see any situation from different angles.

Character traits

Those with the fourth blood group are born leaders. They are good at managing people, organizing and coordinating teamwork. They easily adapt to changing conditions. Such individuals never refuse to help anyone who turns to them, they are always ready to listen and understand.

People with a rare blood type are characterized by pathological honesty; it is difficult for them to tell lies. They hate being deceived and do not tolerate flattery well. These individuals are patient and resilient, resistant to stress, which allows them to easily cope with hard work.

People with a rare blood type do not like to defend their opinions; they avoid conflicts and quarrels. This is due to some indecisiveness that is present in their character. They are also characterized by stiffness.

Kirill Zaitsev spoke about perfectionism, bloody calluses and personal life

“I am a highly paid specialist”: Volodina announced the cost of an hour of consultation

Watering with cold water and more: how to save trees from return frosts

New in blogs

I started the story about the CUP of the Holy GRAIL and the story about the Cathars in this section. Today I am posting material that will not leave anyone indifferent. Tears came to my eyes...

So, here I go. These wonderful stained glass windows show Radomir and Magdalena with their children - son Svetodar and daughter Vesta. Also, another very interesting detail is visible here - the clergyman standing next to Radomir is dressed in the uniform of the Catholic Church, which two thousand years ago in no way could have happened. It appeared among priests only in the 11th-12th centuries. Which, again, proves the birth of Jesus-Radomir only in the 11th century.

...I would give a lot if you would agree to stay with us! One fine day you might change the Earth, Isidora... You have a very rare Gift, and you can truly THINK... But I know that you will not stay. Don't betray yourself. And there's nothing I can do to help you. I know that you will never forgive us as long as you are alive... Just as Magdalene never forgave us for the death of her beloved husband, Jesus Radomir... But we asked her to return, offering protection to her children, but she never returned to us... We live I have been carrying this burden for many years, Isidora, and believe me, there is no heavier burden in the world! But this is our fate, unfortunately, and it is impossible to change it until the real day of “awakening” comes on Earth... When we no longer need to hide, when the Earth finally becomes truly pure and wise, becomes brighter... Then we will be able to think separately, think about each gifted person, without fear that the Earth will destroy us. Without fear that after us there will be no Faith and Knowledge left, there will be no KNOWING people left...

Sever drooped, as if inside he did not agree with what he himself had just told me... I felt with all my heart, with all my soul, that he believed much more in what I believed so confidently. But I also knew that he would not open up to me without betraying Meteor and his beloved, great Teachers. So I decided to leave him alone and not torment him any more...

- Tell me, Sever, what happened to Mary Magdalene? Do her descendants still live somewhere on Earth?

“Of course, Isidora!..” Sever immediately answered, and it seemed to me that he was sincerely pleased by the change of topic... “After the death of Christ, Magdalene left that cruel, evil land that took away from her the most dear person in the world. She left, taking with her her little daughter, who was only four years old at the time. And her eight-year-old son was secretly taken to Spain by the Knights of the Temple so that, no matter what, he would survive and be able to continue the great Family of his father. If you wish, I will tell you the true story of their lives, for what is presented to people today is just a story for the ignorant and blind...

I nodded in agreement to North.

– Please tell me the truth... Tell me about them, Sever...

His thoughts flew far, far away, plunging into ancient, hidden memories covered with the ashes of centuries. And an amazing story began...

– As I already told you earlier, Isidora, after the death of Jesus and Magdalene, their entire bright and sad life was entwined with shameless lies, transferring this lie also to the descendants of this amazing, courageous family... They were “dressed” with ANOTHER FAITH. Their pure images were surrounded by the lives of ALIEN PEOPLE who had not lived for a long time... WORDS that they NEVER SPEAKED were put into their mouths... They were made RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CRIMES that ANOTHER FAITH, the most deceitful and criminal that has ever existed, has committed and is committing Earth...

(From the author: Many, many years have passed since my meeting with Isidora... And now, remembering and living through the former distant years, I managed to find (while in France) the most interesting materials, largely confirming the veracity of Sever’s story about the life of Mary Magdalene and Jesus Radomir , which, I think, will be interesting for everyone reading Isidora’s story, and perhaps even help shed at least some light on the lies of the “rulers of this world.” Please read about the materials I found in the “Supplement” after Isidora’s chapters.)

I felt that this whole story was very difficult for the North. Apparently, his broad soul still did not agree to accept such a loss and was still very sick of it. But he honestly continued to talk further, apparently realizing that later, perhaps, I would not be able to ask him anything more. (since the story of the North). And not only himself, but also his family, his relatives and friends, his friends and followers. After all, it was the wife of the prophet Joshua, the Jewish Mary, who had a sister Martha and a brother Lazarus, the sister of his mother Maria Yakobe, and others who were never near Radomir and Magdalene. Just as there were no other “apostles” next to them - Paul, Matthew, Peter, Luke and the rest... It was the family of the prophet Joshua who moved one and a half thousand years ago to Provence (which in those days was called Transalpine Gaul), in the Greek city of Massalia (present-day Marseille), since Massalia at that time was the “gate” between Europe and Asia, and this was the easiest route for all the “persecuted" to avoid persecution and troubles. The real Magdalene moved to Languedoc a thousand years after the birth of the Jewish Mary, and she was going Home, and not running away from the Jews to other Jews, as did the Jewish Mary, who was never that bright and pure Star that the real Magdalene was. The Jewish Mary was a kind, but narrow-minded woman, married very early. And she was never called Magdalene... This name was “hanged” on her, wanting to unite these two incompatible women into one. And in order to prove such an absurd legend, they came up with a false story about the city of Magdala, which, during the life of the Jew Mary , did not yet exist in Galilee... This whole outrageous “story” of the two Jesuses was deliberately mixed up and confused so that it would be too difficult for a common person to find out the truth. And only those who truly knew how to think saw what a complete lie Christianity was telling - the most cruel and bloodthirsty of all religions. But, as I told you earlier, for the most part, people do not like to THINK for themselves. Therefore, they accepted and accept on faith everything that the Roman Church teaches. It was convenient this way, and it has always been this way. The person was not ready to accept the real TEACHING of Radomir and Magdalene, which required work and independent thinking. But on the other hand, people always liked and approved of what was extremely simple - what told them what to believe in, what could be accepted, and what should be denied. (The Knights of the Temple were called Templars by the King of Jerusalem Baldwin II. Temple - in French - Temple.) They did not have a specific building in which people would come to pray. The Cathar Church was in their soul. But it still had its own apostles (or, as they were called, the Perfect Ones), the first of which, of course, was Magdalene. Perfect were the people who reached the highest levels of Knowledge and devoted themselves to absolute service to it. They continuously improved their Spirit, almost giving up physical food and physical love. The Perfect served people, teaching them their knowledge, treating those in need and protecting their charges from the tenacious and dangerous clutches of the Catholic Church. They were amazing and selfless people, ready to the last to defend their Knowledge and Faith, and Magdalene, who gave it to them. It is a pity that there are almost no Cathar diaries left. All that we have left are the records of Radomir and Magdalene, but they do not give us the exact events of the last tragic days of the courageous and bright Qatari people, since these events took place two hundred years after the death of Jesus and Magdalene.

– Do you remember, Isidora, I told you that Jesus Radomir never had anything to do with that false teaching that the Christian Church is shouting about? It was completely opposite to what Jesus himself taught, and then Magdalene. They taught people real KNOWLEDGE, taught them what we taught them here in Meteora... And Maria knew even more, since she could freely draw her knowledge from the wide expanses of the Cosmos after she left us. They lived closely surrounded by Sorcerers and gifted ones, whom people later renamed as “apostles”... in the notorious “bible” who turned out to be old, distrustful Jews... who, I think, if they could, would truly betray Jesus a thousand times. His “apostles” in reality were the Knights of the Temple, only not built by human hands, but created by the high thought of Radomir himself - the Spiritual Temple of Truth and Knowledge. At first there were only nine of these knights, and they gathered together in order, to the best of their abilities, to protect Radomir and Magdalena in that foreign and dangerous country for them, into which fate so mercilessly threw them. And also, the task of the Knights of the Temple was also to (if something irreparable happened!) preserve the TRUTH, which these two wonderful, bright people brought to the “lost souls” of the Jews, who gave their Gift and their pure Lives for the peace of their beloved , but still a very cruel planet...

– So the “apostles” were also completely different?! What were they like?! Can you tell me about them, North?

I was so interested that for a short moment I even managed to “put to sleep” my torment and fears, I managed to forget the coming pain for a moment!.. I brought down a real barrage of questions on Sever, not even knowing for sure whether there were answers to them. So much I wanted to know the real history of these courageous people, not vulgarized by the lies of five hundred long years!!!

- Oh, they were truly wonderful people - the Knights of the Temple - Isidora!.. Together with Radomir and Magdalena, they created a magnificent backbone of COURAGE, HONOR and FAITH, on which was built the bright TEACHING that our ancestors once left for the salvation of our native Earth. Two of the Knights of the Temple were our students, as well as hereditary warriors from the oldest European aristocratic families. They became our brave and gifted Sorcerers, ready to do anything to save Jesus and Magdalene. Four were descendants of the Rus-Merovingians, who also had a great Gift, like all their distant ancestors - the kings of Thrace... Like Magdalene herself, also born from this extraordinary dynasty, and proudly carried her family Gift. Two were our Magi, who voluntarily left Meteora in order to protect their beloved Disciple, Jesus Radomir, who was going to his own destruction. They could not betray Radomir in their souls, and even knowing what awaited him, they followed him without regret. Well, the last, ninth of the knights-defenders, about whom no one still knows or writes, was the brother of Christ himself, the son of the White Magus - Radan (Ra - given, given by Ra) ... It was he who managed to save his son Radomir, after his death. But, unfortunately, while defending him, he died himself...

– Tell me, Sever, doesn’t this have anything in common with the legend of the twins, where it is said that Christ had a twin brother? I read about this in our library and always wanted to know whether it was true, or just another lie of the “holy fathers”?

– No, Isidora, Radan was not Radomir’s twin. This would be an undesirable additional danger to the already quite complex life of Christ and Magdalene. You know, after all, that twins are connected too closely by the thread of their birth, and a danger to the life of one can become a danger to the other? – I nodded. - Therefore, the Magi could not have made such a mistake.

– So, after all, not everyone in Meteora betrayed Jesus?! – I exclaimed joyfully. – Didn’t everyone calmly watch him go to his death?..

- Well, of course not, Isidora!.. We would all leave to protect him. Yes, not everyone managed to step over their Duty... I know that you don’t believe me, but we all loved him very much... and, of course, Magdalene. It’s just that not everyone could forget their responsibilities and give up everything because of one person, no matter how special he was. You give your life to save many, right? So our Magi remained in Meteor to guard the Sacred Knowledge and teach other gifted ones. Such is life, Isidora... And everyone makes it better, to the best of their ability.

- Tell me, Sever, why do you call the Frankish kings Rus? Did these peoples have anything in common? As far as I remember, they were always called Franks?.. And later, the beautiful Frankia became France. Is not it?

- No, Isidora. Do you know what the word Franks means? – I shook my head negatively. – Franks simply means free. And the Merovingians were northern Rus who came to teach the free Franks the art of war, government of the country, politics and science (as they went to all other countries, being born for the teaching and benefit of other living people). And they were called correctly - Meravingli (we-Ra-in-Inglia; we, the children of Ra, bringing Light in our native Primordial England). But, of course, then this word, like many other things, was “simplified”... and it began to sound like Merovingians. Thus a new “history” was created, which said that the name Merovingians came from the name of the Frankish king - Merovia. Although, this name had nothing to do with King Merovius. Moreover, King Merovius was already the thirteenth of the Merovingian kings. And it would be more logical, naturally, to name the entire dynasty after the first of the reigning kings, wouldn’t it?

Just like the other stupid legend about the “sea monster” that supposedly gave birth to the Merovingian dynasty, this name, naturally, also had nothing to do with it. Apparently, the Thinking Dark Ones really wanted people not to know the real meaning of the NAME of the ruling Frank dynasty. Therefore, they tried to quickly rename them and turn them into “weak, unlucky and pathetic” kings, once again lying about the real world history. The Meravingli were a bright, intelligent and gifted dynasty of northern Rus, who voluntarily left their great homeland and mixed their blood with the highest dynasties of the then Europe, so that from this a new powerful Family of magicians and warriors would be born, who could wisely rule the countries and peoples that inhabited that time time for semi-wild Europe. They were wonderful magicians and warriors, they could heal the suffering and teach the worthy. Without exception, all Meravingli had very long hair, which they did not agree to cut under any circumstances, since they drew Living Power through it. But, unfortunately, this was also known to the Thinking Dark Ones. That is why the most terrible punishment was the forced tonsure of the last Meravingl royal family. After the betrayal of the royal Jewish treasurer, who with lies and cunning set brother against brother, son against father in this family, and then easily played on human pride and honor... So for the first time in the royal family of the Meravingli, the former stronghold was shaken. And the unshakable faith in the unity of the Family gave the first deep crack... The centuries-old war of the Meravingleys with the opposing clan began to come to its sad end... The last real king of this wonderful dynasty - Dagobert II, was, again, treacherously killed - he died while hunting by hand a bribed assassin who stabbed him in the back with a poisoned spear. This is where the most gifted dynasty in Europe, which brought light and strength to the unenlightened European people, ended (or rather, was exterminated). As you can see, Isidora, cowards and traitors at all times did not dare to fight openly, knowing for sure that they never had, and would not have any, even the slightest chance to win honestly. But on the other hand, with lies and baseness they defeated even the strongest, using their honor and conscience in their favor... with absolutely no concern for their own “perishing in lies” soul. Thus, having destroyed the “interfering enlightened ones,” the Thinking Dark Ones then came up with a “story” that suited them. And the people for whom such a “story” was created immediately easily accepted it, without even trying to think... This, again, is our Earth, Isidora. And I am sincerely sad and hurt that I can’t make her “wake up”...

My heart suddenly ached bitterly and painfully... This means that at all times there were bright and strong people who courageously, but hopelessly fought for the happiness and future of humanity! And they all, as a rule, died... What was the reason for such cruel injustice?.. What was the reason for such repeated deaths?

Original text at: https://www.liveinternet.ru/users/2979159/post98786401/

Job

It would seem that people with the fourth blood type have everything to make a successful career, but this is not so. Most of them are torn apart by internal contradictions, which prevents them from focusing on what really matters. They often have serious problems with self-esteem.

Those with a rare blood type are excellent workers, but only when everything goes as usual. When serious troubles arise, they are lost and do not know what to do. Instability can force them to quit their jobs, as they attach great importance to their psychological comfort.

Descendants of Mary Magdalene

As it really was. As an adult, Jesus married a girl, Mary, from a wealthy family. He surprised believers with various miracles and turned water into wine at a wedding.

Pontius Pilate was a very cruel procurator of Judea and the Jews began to wait for a savior who would expel him. At age 30, Jesus began the journey to take the Jewish throne. However, he understood that in this political situation he would not get the throne and made a deal with Pontius Pilate to fake his death. This was beneficial for Pilate, as he got rid of his enemy.

Maria and her children fled to France. She raised children, and when the time came, she died in Provence. There is evidence that the Holy Grail is not a golden cup filled with the blood of Christ, but his daughter Sarah, whom Mary hid with loved ones. Treasure chests are fiction; they contained teaching papers.

The best article for you, go to: Can Orthodox Christians eat pork?

Daughter Sarah had a large number of descendants who are associated with the dynasty of Merovingian kings. Lady Diana was a descendant of the Merovingians and therefore was chosen as Prince Charles of England not by chance, but to prolong the family line.

The Lord is always with you!

Choice of profession

These individuals are distinguished by their ability to embrace the immensity; it is easy for them to see what is hidden from the eyes of other people. Studies have shown that those with the fourth blood group have a special craving for mystical professions, in which they can achieve a lot and realize their unique talents. Among these people you can find many clairvoyants, mediums, and fortune tellers.

Those with a rare blood type are curious and love to solve riddles. Such people make excellent scientists and inventors. They also often choose creative professions, for example, becoming writers, musicians, and actors.

“My favorite daughter gets bonuses”: an Australian shared his education system

How to quickly and easily remove stains from jeans from upholstery: simple instructions

Experts say that by 2035 humanity will switch to artificial meat.

Finally, these individuals are perfectly suited to professions that involve actively working with people. They are able to inspire trust in others, are always ready to listen and understand, and come to the rescue. For example, such people may prefer the profession of a psychologist, doctor or teacher.

"Da Vinci Code" - error in the third digit.

Arimoya.

For false Christs and false prophets will arise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.

Book of Matthew 24:24

Dan Brown's new novel [1] is called the “bestseller of the decade”: the circulation in the USA and other countries has already exceeded 17 million copies, the book has been translated into more than 30 languages. This is impressive. Although all the characters in the novel are fictional, Brown swears that the descriptions of secret rituals and documents, works of art and architecture, as well as the messages hidden in them, are absolutely real and reliable.

“If you thought Martin Scorsese's 1988 film The Last Temptation of Christ was a blast,” Baptist theologian Albert Mohler (crosswalk.com) notes grimly in his review, “then The Da Vinci Code is a real thermonuclear bomb. This book claims that Jesus Christ was married to Mary Magdalene, that their marriage resulted in a child, and that Mary, after her husband was crucified, fled with this child to Gaul, where they became the beginning of the Merovingian line of European kingdoms." . Dan Brown also attached the great Leonardo to the plot, who was not only one of the grand masters of the Order of Guardians (the “Community of Zion”), but also left numerous hints about how Christianity seemed to him, including in his artistic creations. If you want to find out how they manifest themselves in, say, La Gioconda or The Last Supper, read Brown’s blockbuster,” Russian reviewers recommend.

It is not for nothing that the already mentioned Albert Mohler grumbles: “One should never underestimate the commercial potential of heresy dressed in the form of a fascinating story.”

In fact, almost all the information related to the most secret Masonic order “Community of Zion” and the secret of the descendants of Mary Magdalene allegedly kept by its leaders was taken by the author from the English book “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail” (“Holy Blood and the Holy Grail”). reprinted several times in the West since the 1980s. Dan Brown only briefly mentions this book along with other sources. Here it was published in 1996 in a circulation of 999 copies and with a hooligan, openly anti-Christian preface by a certain “Internal Predictor of the USSR” (!), but the content of the book itself deserves serious attention. The English authors, as they themselves write, are agnostics, therefore some of their approaches and conclusions are unacceptable for Christian consciousness, but a significant part of the questions they posed and the research they carried out are very interesting. I repeat: almost the entire “texture” of their book was used by Dan Brown in “The Da Vinci Code.”

I wrote in detail about the “Holy Blood and the Holy Grail” in the brochure “The Tragedy of Princess Diana and the Prophecy of Nostradamus” (Iskusstvo-SPb Publishing House, 1998). There I also predicted that in the coming years, world Freemasonry will begin to widely reveal and promote its true and imaginary secrets (let me remind you that until the beginning of the 21st century, conversations about Freemasonry were the lot of marginalized people in Russia).

So, the time has come when the true and imaginary secrets of Freemasonry flood the commercial book market. However, the “thermonuclear explosion” that was supposed to destroy the Vatican and Christianity in general did not happen. Neither the Vatican, nor the Russian Orthodox Church, nor other Christian denominations even considered it necessary to make any official statements regarding this heretical book. That's probably right. But it is also true that its powerful destructive potential “slow action” cannot be underestimated . If we assume that Mary Magdalene gave birth to a child from the Savior, then why is this not said in the Gospels? In the Acts of the Holy Apostles? Is it possible to believe in this case the Apostles themselves and their Gospels? Moreover, can the Church be trusted? Tens of millions of people around the world have already read this book, and tens of millions will continue to read it. There is no doubt that in the coming months Hollywood will complete the film “The Da Vinci Code” (filming is already underway in England), and there is no doubt that this film will be watched by hundreds of millions of people around the world.

For this reason, it is necessary to bring to the widest possible audience hypotheses of the history of early Christianity that are alternative to the undoubtedly heretical Da Vinci Code (concerning Mary Magdalene and her descendants), compatible with the Christian canon, with the Holy Scriptures. I offer my hypothesis to the readers – more on it a little later.

So, Dan Brown, following the English authors of the “Holy Grail” (Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln) argues (referring to the documents of the “Community of Zion”) that:

1. Jesus Christ was married to Mary Magdalene.
2. Mary Magdalene gave birth to a child shortly after the death of Jesus Christ.
3. The father of this child was Jesus Christ.
4. She fled with this child to Gaul, and their offspring hundreds of years later gave rise to the royal families of Europe.

The apocryphal Gospels of Peter, Thomas and Philip (in recent years, serious researchers are inclined to recognize their authenticity) indeed confirm that, firstly, Mary Magdalene was a companion (wife? - “companion” the apostles then called their spouses) of Jesus Christ, that He loved her, and that, secondly, the apostles, at least Peter, were “jealous” of their Teacher for her and Peter even asked Jesus to remove Mary Magdalene from their “inner circle.” However, in none of the apocrypha indicated is there a single hint of Mary’s pregnancy during the life of Jesus Christ.

So, according to Masonic revelations, Jesus Christ was married to Mary Magdalene, and she bore him a child. On the other hand, since Jesus, according to the gospel genealogies, descended from King David (tribe of Judah) [2] and Mary, according to legend, descended from the first king of Israel Saul (tribe of Benjamin), the heir united both royal bloods of Israel and appeared as such thus, the legitimate heir to the throne of Jerusalem, the very long-awaited King-Messiah for the Jews, whose role Jesus Christ refused, declaring His kingdom “not of this world,” the Kingdom of Heaven. [3]

However, the secret of the birth of this child had to be hidden both from the Romans and Rome, which owned Palestine, and from the faithful Jews, most of whom rejected the Savior and considered Him a deceiver who did not justify their hopes for liberation from the power of the Romans. Moreover, Mary Magdalene could not count on the support of the apostles of Christ and His disciples, since some of them (like Peter, according to the apocryphal “Gospel of Peter” from the Nag Hammadi manuscripts) even during the life of Jesus were “jealous” of Him for Mary, and all they then became the support of His great Mission, and not a clan of power-hungers caring about an earthly inheritance. Mary Magdalene, according to legend, soon after the end of the Savior’s earthly journey left Palestine and ended up in one of the Jewish colonies in the south of what is now France (Marseille), in ancient Aquitaine.

Here we will interrupt the presentation of the hypothesis of the three Englishmen and their epigone Dan Brown - let’s take a breath. This hypothesis can be presented in a more acceptable form for Christianity, if we consider that Jesus Christ had half-brothers (the sons of Joseph the Betrothed from his first marriage), and Mary Magdalene had sisters, so that the child of any of these brothers or sisters also united in themselves all the royal blood of Israel, respectively, of kings David and Saul. Of the four half-brothers of Jesus, the fate of only one is known, James the Righteous, and nothing is known about the lives of the rest. Therefore, it is much more correct to accept the hypothesis that, surrounded by Mary Magdalene, most likely, her sister in Aquitaine gave birth to a baby of royal blood from the half-brother of Jesus Christ, who, according to Jewish laws, could lay claim (and he alone) to the throne of Jerusalem.

Indeed, isn’t it logical to assume that Mary Magdalene sailed to Aquitaine not alone, but accompanied by one of the people closest to her Teacher? It is equally logical to assume that this was one (or two, or three) of Christ's half-brothers, except James, who remained in Jerusalem. It is also likely that in Aquitaine one of the sisters of Mary Magdalene became the companion (wife) of one of these half-brothers, and that it was in their family that the heir to the royal blood of David and Saul was born.

Historians of early Christianity know that several years after the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, by decree of the Emperor of Rome, a special “commission” worked in Jerusalem, which searched for the heirs of the Israeli throne (direct descendants of kings David and Saul) and interviewed those found - however, making sure that these few They were simple people, mostly peasants, proud of their origins, but not thinking about the throne of Jerusalem; the search was stopped. This historical fact is indirect evidence that some rumors about the birth of an heir to royal blood reached Rome. Maybe the Romans were simply looking in the wrong place? Historians also know that several hundred years later in the Jewish colonies of Aquitaine they claimed that a “Jewish king” lived among them, but by that time Rome was no longer interested in him.

So our hypothesis looks like this:

1. Equal to the Apostles Mary Magdalene was a beloved disciple of Jesus Christ, but not a wife in the direct and ordinary sense of the word.
2. Mary Magdalene left Jerusalem shortly after the Ascension of Jesus Christ - first to Rome and then to Aquitaine - probably accompanied by her sisters and one or more of Jesus' half-brothers.
3. It is likely that in Aquitaine one of Mary Magdalene's sisters gave birth to a child by one of these brothers.
4. Their descendants hundreds of years later gave rise to several royal families of Europe.

There is no doubt that sincerely believing Christians are absolutely confident in the non-carnal nature of the love of Mary Magdalene and Jesus Christ. It was an ideal, highest love - an emotional and spiritual union. It is known that some Orthodox priests entered into such marriages by mutual consent with their brides. For example, it is known that this was the marriage of John of Kronstadt. Even before the wedding, he told his bride (Elena Konstantinovna): “There are many happy families... Let’s dedicate our marriage to God.”

Another thing is that the Christian Church itself, starting around the 5th century, humiliated the memory of Mary Magdalene, falsely declaring her a “repentant prostitute”, and “closed” the topic of love and the union of Jesus Christ with her. Well, now the Vatican is “reaping the fruits” of the untruths and silences it sowed.

Let us emphasize that our hypothesis does not change one iota the texture of the Masonic doctrine in terms of the further origin of the royal families of Europe and the very history of secret Masonic communities! At the same time, this hypothesis puts everything in its place. To God - what is God's, to Caesar - what is Caesar's!

Now let's return to the book of three Englishmen and the blockbuster by Dan Brown.

So, a narrow circle of those who knew the secret of the birth of the royal baby had to hide it in Aquitaine, which was also under the rule of Rome. Years, decades passed; The parents of the heir and the first initiates into his secret died. In Aquitaine the royal tree of Israel grew and branched, and a narrow circle of ever new initiates preserved this secret. Hundreds of years passed, and in 476 the last emperor of the Western Roman Empire, Romulus Augustulus, was deposed - the first obstacle to the throne of Jerusalem fell! But who ruled the Frankish state in these times? Historians of France count the first legendary royal dynasty from Merovey, his son Childeric and grandson Clovis. The legend connects the origin of Merovey with the prince of the Franks Clodio and a certain “overseas beast of the Neptunes” - according to legend, the blood of primordial Frankish families and some “overseas” blood merged in Merovey... And here the authors of the “Sacred Riddle” (four Englishmen) put forward a second hypothesis, which is substantiated by them much more convincingly than the first. They prove that the “overseas” blood of Merovee was the same royal blood of Israel, the blood of the heir of Mary Magdalene and Jesus Christ (in the authors’ version).

Let us emphasize that our hypothesis that this Heir was born in the marriage of one of the sisters of Mary Magdalene and one of the half-brothers of Jesus Christ “does not in any way violate” the history of the “main Masonic secret”: for the Jews of the Diaspora in Aquitaine, this child was legitimate from the very beginning heir to the throne of Israel (for he united in himself the royal blood of David and Saul), and hundreds of years later, when the descendants of this Heir intermarried with the indigenous leaders of the Franks, forming the Merovite dynasty - after that, for this dynasty itself, the legend about its origin from Jesus Christ themselves and Mary Magdalene was both beneficial and natural. Probably, the Merovites already sincerely believed in their “divine origin.”

We will not retell here in any detail the course of reasoning of the authors of the “Sacred Riddle” about the Merovite dynasty and will go straight to the times of the Crusades.

With these words, we recall the names of King John, Richard the Lionheart, Frederick Barbarossa, but the knight-leader of the crusaders during the storming of Jerusalem on July 15, 1099 was the Duke of Lower Lorraine, Godfrey of Bouillon, and he also became the first Christian king of Palestine, Jerusalem. By the way, he alone of all sold all his lands in France before the campaign and went on the campaign as having a legal right to the Jerusalem throne. It was he who became a national hero during his lifetime, and it was about him that the court troubadours of Europe soon began to compose legend poems about the “Grail Cup”... This, as we know, is a symbol of mercy and compassion - precisely those qualities for which people loved and Princess Diana, "The People's Princess Lady Di". However, the “Grail Cup” is a mysterious cup...

We say the Holy Grail, Saint Graal, or San Graal, but in the original sources it was written together: Sangraal or Sangreal. This expression, according to the authors of the “Sacred Riddle,” had a double meaning: both the well-known one (the cup or cup with the blood of Jesus Christ), and another, if read as “Sang Real” - translated as “True Blood”, in modern English “ Sang Royal" - "Royal Blood" - the blood that, according to the Masonic version, Mary Magdalene brought to Aquitaine under her heart... The Bavarian knight and poet of the 13th century, Wolfram von Eschenbach, in his "Parzival" came closest to this secret and in Subsequent novels began to reveal the genealogical secret of Godfrey of Bouillon: but death interrupted his work. However, according to the authors of the “Sacred Riddle”, it is clear from them that he led the genealogy of Godfrey of Bouillon to the male line of the Merovites, which was interrupted in the 8th century (as was believed before him). Why didn’t Gottfried himself openly reveal his great secret, but only supported rumors about it?

According to the version of the “Sacred Riddle”, by this time the heirs and a narrow circle of knights initiated into their secret, taking into account all the contradictory and complex interests of many European monarchies, decided to submit to the complex historical and political reality and announce their origin only after seizing power over all of Europe , - their ambitions and plans have spread so far since then.

Moreover, it is known that it was during the reign of Godfrey of Bouillon that secret communities were created in Jerusalem, the main ones among them being the “Community of Zion” and the “Community of the Temple”, which then created many “subsidiaries” in the form of secret societies of the Cathars, Albigensians, Templars...[ 4]

Dreams of earthly power tend to subordinate everything to their goal, and these heretical sects of Christianity no longer recognized the Divine essence of Christ, His Resurrection from the dead, based on the earliest heresies of Arianism and Manichaeism. Such a doctrine, if realized, could give the Heirs power over the entire world, not only the Christian one. Indeed, if Jesus was just a mortal prophet (even the greatest), then such a Christ could be recognized by believing Muslims, and then by Jews, and a descendant of such a Jesus Christ, being the king of Jerusalem, could bring about the reconciliation of such a new “Christianity” with Islam and Judaism. However, it is known that historical circumstances did not allow events to take place in this direction, and the Frankish king in Jerusalem was never able to strengthen his position. In 1291, the Holy Land was again lost to the Christian knights, the Merovingians were left without the Jerusalem crown.

Then, throughout the centuries that followed until our time, the “heirs” were almost at the goal at least four times, but still ended up losing. The authors of “The Sacred Riddle” believe that this was the case in the 16th century, when the house of Guise almost took possession of the French throne; in the 17th century, when the frondeurs almost gave the crown of France to one of the members of the House of Lorraine; at the end of the 19th century, when something like the Holy League of Europe proposed to unite Catholic Europe around the Habsburgs, and only, as the authors write, “the aggressiveness of Germany and Russia became an obstacle to the implementation of this project and provoked a war that shook all the dynasties of the continent.” [5]

But the Merovingian family came closest to realizing their hopes in the 18th century, and if not for the French Revolution, it is quite possible to assume that the House of Habsburg-Lorraine would have dominated all of Europe around 1800. This is what the authors of “The Sacred Riddle” think, and not without good reason. [6]

But it’s time to tell us who among modern monarchs and rulers, among the European elite, is related to the Merovingian family, to the “Sacred Riddle”? Family trees grow in breadth and height from one generation to the next and form real forests... Michael Baigent and his co-authors, as a result of many years of and sometimes detective searches and investigations, have established at least twenty families belonging to the Merovingian clan in Europe, and each has a large number of side branches. They name, as direct heirs, the names of the Habsburgs of Lorraine, Plantard de Saint Clair, Luxembourg, Montesquiou, Monpezat, and in England - the families of the Sinclairs, Devonshires and Stuarts...

At the same time, let us remember that their genealogy, even if it is connected with the genealogy of the ancient Israeli kings, still goes back not to Jesus Christ, but, perhaps, to one of His half-brothers...

Boris Romanov January 6, 2005 https://www.petroprognoz.spb.ru/ Published September 18, 2007

PS

Here I only want to add that Dan Brown’s attempts to justify his aggressive (regarding Christianity) fantasies with references to the Gospels turned out to be completely unfounded. Over the past three months, I have participated in the Hollywood forum https://www.thedavincichallenge.com, where fans of this bestseller, as well as numerous atheists and agnostics of an anti-Christian persuasion, tried to “trample” the few (on this forum) Christians (of different denominations).

At first, the behavior of anti-Christians was very aggressive:

“And who did Christ marry in Canna of Galilee?”

“The Evangelist John did not exist in nature - the evangelists encrypted Mary Magdalene under his name,”

- Dan Brown's supporters asked sarcastically. However, it was enough to give them exact quotes from the Gospels to make it clear to everyone that these references and statements are unfounded. They simply did not read the Gospels any carefully, apparently like Dan Brown himself.

A month after the discussions began, Dan Brown's supporters, except the most stubborn ones, admitted that his book was nothing more than fiction. A week later, Dan Brown himself said in an interview that his book is fiction and he does not claim to be the “ultimate truth.”

God bless!

The question remains: How harmful are the book and movie The Da Vinci Code to Christianity? Hard to say. After all, his book and the film, now being released, have awakened a new interest in Christianity in the world. Millions of people will read the Gospels, some again, some for the first time, and will be convinced that The Da Vinci Code has no basis in the New Testament.

I will give here an anecdote about neighbors - a priest and a bus driver.

Once upon a time there lived these two neighbors. The priest was boring and gave his boring sermons in church, and the cheerful bus driver often drank from the bottle, sometimes even during working hours. Then they died. The priest, to his surprise, ended up in hell, but he came to terms with it, although he often walked in sadness along the fence separating hell from Heaven. And then one day he found a hole in this fence, looked into it - and to his amazement he saw his dead neighbor there, the bus driver!

- God! - he begged. “I was not a saint, I was a sinner, and I humbly accepted my share in hell.” But please explain to me, a sinner, why this drunk ended up in Paradise?

And he heard God's voice:

— When you read your boring sermons, the people in the church were sleeping. But when your neighbor was driving a bus, people prayed with all their hearts to God that the driver would not crash into the nearest pole. And he didn’t crash!

That's how it is with Dan Brown's book. Let's hope that millions of people in the world, thanks to him and the film based on his book, will carefully read the Gospels for the first time in their lives.

Comments.

[1]

The publication of this article on Arimoya is somewhat belated, since the “passion” for the “Da Vinci Code” died down a year ago. However, I considered this publication necessary, since the topic of the “Sacred Riddle”, one way or another, was touched upon in our publications, especially in the article “Christianity on the threshold of the end of times.” In my opinion, Boris Romanov’s article most accurately and at the same time, without unnecessary detail, reveals the essence of the problem associated with this novel. Therefore, remembering the rule “A said, say B,” albeit with a slight delay, I am posting this article on the site.

[2]

Here I would like to make some clarification. On the one hand, a direct descendant of King David was Joseph, Mary’s husband. But, since Jesus was the “Son of the living God,” the question arises, how legitimate is it to consider Jesus a descendant of King David? (Matthew 1:18): “The birth of Jesus Christ was like this: after the betrothal of His Mother Mary to Joseph, before they were united, it turned out that She was pregnant with the Holy Spirit.” On the other hand, in the same Gospel of Matthew (1:1) it is said: “The genealogy of Jesus Christ, the Son of David, the Son of Abram.” In addition, the Apostle John in his revelation calls Jesus Christ “the lion of the root of David” (Rev 5:5): “behold, the lion of the tribe of Judah, the root of David, has overcome, [and can] open this book and open its seven seals.” This is probably one of the sacred mysteries of the Bible.

[3]

More precisely, Jesus literally said the following (John 18:36): “Jesus answered: My kingdom is not of this world; If My kingdom were of this world, then My servants would fight for Me, so that I would not be handed over to the Jews; but now my kingdom is not from here.” One of the key theses of this phrase, as it seems to me, is its ending: “but now my kingdom is not from here.” Those. Jesus does not say that His kingdom is not of this world at all, as most people understand, but He said that His kingdom is NOW, i.e. during his mission, it was not from here. However, as is evident from other passages of Scripture, the time will come when the kingdom of the world will become his kingdom. (Rev. 12:10): “And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven: Now has come salvation and power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of His Christ, because the accuser of our brethren is cast out, who slandered them before our God day and night.” .

[4]

But here we are dealing with an obvious falsification of history by the authors of “The Sacred Riddle.” It is possible that the “community of Zion” was created after the capture of Jerusalem by the Crusaders, but perhaps not. There is no mention of this event in the history of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. It is known that an organization called the Priory of Sion was founded in France in 1956 and existed for less than a year. In the 1960s, one of the founders and de facto leader of the Priory, Pierre Plantard, became involved in historical hoaxes, which gave rise to the widespread legend about a powerful secret organization allegedly existing since the 11th century. In 1975, handwritten scrolls known as the "Secret Files" of the Priory of Sion, now captured on microfilm, were discovered in the Bibliothèque nationale de Paris. It is likely that, first of all, the authors of the “Sacred Riddle” drew their information from this “secret dossier.”

However, what is known for certain is that the creation of orders of knighthood was sanctioned personally by the Pope to protect pilgrims and carry out other military missions in the interests of the governors of St. Peter. And no Masonic organizations, which were not in sight at that time, had anything to do with its creation. To ensure the activities of the order, large plots of land were transferred to its management in the form of donations, and they were also given the right to collect church taxes - tithes - in many regions of Europe. Thanks to the effective management of entrusted property, the order became one of the richest organizations in Europe. However, it was this wealth that led to his downfall.

As for the connections of the knights of the order with the Cathars and Albigensians, this is also a lie, replicated by numerous followers of the Masonic historical concept. The Cathars or Albigensians were spiritual followers of ancient dualistic traditions, the most famous of which is Manichaeism. This teaching came to Europe through Bulgaria, where Manichaeism, under the name of Bohumilism, was widespread. The leaders of the southern regions of France, with a predominantly Gallic population, made this doctrine the flag of their political struggle against the Frankish Germans, who conquered the northern regions of the former Gaul. Therefore, the Catholic Church, which supported the Franks, was a natural opponent of the Gallic patriots who defended their independence from the Frankish conquerors. The Templars, being faithful servants of the papal throne, had no reason to support the Cathars. Therefore, they, along with the entire Frankish knighthood, participated in the “Albigensian” crusade of 1209 - 1255, declared by Pope Innocent III, and which ended in the complete defeat of the Cathars.

Thus, it can be stated that the creators of “Masonic” history deliberately distort historical facts in order to artificially embellish the history of their organization, to make it more ancient and colorful.

The tragedy of the fall of the Templar Order is connected, first of all, with the power and love of money of the French king Philip the Fair, who wanted to replenish his treasury at the expense of the wealth of the order, and the weakening of the power of the Popes. As modern research shows, all charges against the Templars were fabricated, and confessions were extracted under torture. The only real mistake of the Templars was too much enthusiasm for banking and economic activities. Therefore, the Templars were pragmatists, and not mystics seeking secret knowledge. They were practically not interested in subtle matters; they were, in modern terms, politicians and business executives, and not mystics and seekers of secret knowledge. As a result, the order simply did not fit into the political configuration of Europe in the 14th century and fell victim to the new elite that came to power in France. Over the three centuries of the order's activity, the political situation in Europe has changed fundamentally. If in the 11th century, when the order was created, the most powerful ruler of Europe was the Pope, who had the ability to depose kings at his own discretion, then in the 14th century the situation changed radically - power in Europe was seized by the French kings, who took control of, including including the papal throne. Therefore, the old papal guard - the knightly orders - had no place left in this new Europe and they fell victim to greed, using the terminology of Andreev, the asuraor of France. The remnants of the Templars found refuge in England and Germany.

Thus, the Knights Templar were not servants of the “Masonic idea”, but were faithful servants of the throne of St. Peter and fell during the collapse of his political power. But that is another story.

[5]

Also another lie from the authors of the book about the “holy blood”. Of course, one can take into account their patriotic desire to present the politics of their Motherland - England - in a favorable light, but this does not give them the right to blame other countries for acts that they did not commit.

Thus, all historical facts indicate that Great Britain pursued the most aggressive policy at the end of the 19th century. It was this country that, after the defeat of Napoleon, owned the largest number of colonies, but thirsted for more. It was England that carried out the first military campaign of a new type, known as the “Anglo-Boer” War, during which it captured South Africa. It was England and the United States that armed the Japanese army with modern weapons and sent it against the Russian Far East. It was England that began to obstruct the development of the German merchant (!) fleet, in order to maintain its status as “Mistress of the Seas.” It was England that made every possible diplomatic effort to destroy the military and political alliance of Russia and Germany, which ultimately led to the outbreak of the First World War. Because if this alliance were preserved, England would be afraid to fight alone against the Russian-German coalition. By the way, this is exactly the situation that took place during the Russian-Turkish War of 1877-1878, when Russia and Germany were still allies. England was afraid to enter the war, despite the direct threat of Russia seizing the straits from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, which England sought to prevent at all costs. Because one of the worst English nightmares was the specter of the Russian fleet in the Mediterranean.

In addition, it was the last Russian Emperor Nicholas II who initiated the creation of the “League of Nations” and the general disarmament of countries that were potential opponents in the First World War. It was the Russian emperor who sought by all possible means to prevent the coming world massacre. he was ready to make any concessions to preserve peace. So, after the Russo-Japanese War, Russia ceded the Kuril Islands and the southern part of Sakhalin Island to Japan, and also curtailed almost all of its activities in China. Moreover, this happened not under pressure from Japan, which simply exhausted its military resources and was not capable of further military operations, but through the good will of Russia, seeking to extinguish the source of a possible global military conflict.

[6]

Generally a strange statement. After all, it is known that the Freemasons took an active part in the preparation of the French Revolution. In other words, it turns out that there is no unity in the Masonic ranks if the right hand does not know what the left is doing. And, as we know (Mark 3:24): “If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.”

Moreover, as is known, the overthrow of the Bourbon dynasty, which occurred during the French Revolution, opened the way to the throne for Napoleon Bonaparte, who married an Austrian princess from the House of Habsburg. Therefore, Napoleon's descendants, according to Jewish tradition, would be Habsburgs. Thus, it was not the French Revolution, but the Russian army, which defeated Napoleon’s troops, that prevented the creation of a united Europe under the auspices of the Habsburg dynasty.

Sergey Yevtushenko September 18, 2007

Relationship

Men with this blood type attract the opposite sex with their intelligence and originality. They cannot be called picky; they are easily carried away, but also quickly cool down. Such men can talk about their love, but this does not mean that they are truly filled with deep feelings.

Women are also attractive in the eyes of the opposite sex, they easily charm and fall in love with themselves. However, they are more picky in everything related to relationships. A man who wants to stand out from the crowd of admirers and attract attention will have to try hard. Such ladies are distinguished by their demandingness in love.

"Brothers" and "sisters" of Jesus Christ^

An episode that can cause confusion. “And His Mother and His brothers came to Him, but they could not come to Him because of the crowd. And they let Him know: Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to see You. He answered and said to them, “My mother and my brothers are those who hear the word of God and do it” (Luke 8:19-21; see also Matt. 12:46-50; Mark 3:32-35).

Of course, there is a metaphor in Jesus’ answer, that is, brothers are simply like-minded people, spiritually close people, but they undoubtedly came to him and were waiting for him, relatives in the flesh.

Moreover, we know one of Jesus’ brothers according to the flesh well. The Apostle Paul speaks about him when he talks about his journey to Jerusalem, where he saw the Apostle Peter and the Apostle James: “But I saw no other of the apostles except James the brother of the Lord” (Gal. 1:19). The Apostle James was the first Christian bishop of Jerusalem: he was known for his righteous life, which, however, did not stop the crowd from tearing him to pieces in 62 AD. (or in ’66). The remarkable Council Epistle of the Apostle James, which is one of the earliest works of Christian literature, has been preserved. By the way, in the Orthodox monthly book on the day of remembrance of the author of this message (October 23, old style) it is said: “Apostle James, brother of the Lord according to the flesh.”

There is also mention in the Gospel of the sisters of Jesus.

There is such a popular expression: “There is no prophet in his own country.” It means: an outstanding person is usually not appreciated where he was born and is well known. Like many other winged sayings, and this goes back to one gospel episode.

You know that although Jesus was born in Bethlehem, a city in southern Palestine, in the region called Judea, he spent his childhood in the city of Nazareth, located in the Galilee region of northern Palestine. So, one day in Galilee, “in his own fatherland,” Jesus preached in one of the synagogues. “...and many who heard said in amazement: Where did He get this from? What kind of wisdom was given to Him, and how are such miracles performed by His hands? Isn't He the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, Josiah, Judas and Simon? Are not His sisters here, between us? And they were offended because of Him. Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor, except in his own country, and among his relatives, and in his own house” (Mark 6:2-4; see also Matt. 13:54-57; Luke 4:22- 24; John 4:44).

Notice that not only are Jesus' brothers named here, but his sisters are also mentioned.

There is a passage in the account of the birth of Jesus that seems to suggest that Jesus had siblings. Matthew says that the Virgin Mary “gave birth to her firstborn Son” (Matthew 1:25), and Luke echoes him: “And she gave birth to her firstborn Son, and wrapped Him in swaddling clothes, and laid Him in a manger...” (Matthew 2:7 ). In Russian, you can say that, suppose, Vanya is the first-born, if it is known that there were other children behind him. If there were no other children, then they usually say that Vanya is the only child, and in this case the word firstborn is inappropriate.

Meanwhile, it is resolved if we take into account that the semantic space of the Hebrew word 'ahey, as well as the word 'akhut, is much wider than the correspondence in the Russian language - brother and sister. Brothers and sisters were called not only people descended from the same father and from the same mother, but in general all relatives of a person, more or less equal to him in age. Not just half-brothers or cousins, but all relatives in general, even those whom in our culture we would call distant. Thus, the brothers of Jesus in the flesh were considered not only the children of Joseph, the betrothed of the Virgin Mary, from a previous marriage, but also, for example, the same Jacob, whose mother, named Mary (she is mentioned in Matthew 27:56), was a relative of the Virgin Mary . Thus, a resident of Palestine had many brothers and sisters, and it is not at all necessary that his mother had more children. Therefore, when the Gospel speaks about the brothers and sisters of Jesus, this does not at all claim that he was not the only - “only begotten” - child.

As for the word firstborn, it corresponds to the Greek word yprotōtokos, literally “firstborn,” but ultimately must convey the meaning of the Hebrew word-concept bekhor. The word bekhor does not contain any mention of numerals: bekhor is the son who “opens the womb” of a woman, and it is not at all assumed that there were more brothers after him. There may or may not be brothers, but the born son is certainly called bekhor, because according to custom, many advantages were assigned to the “bekhor”. Only the “bekhor” was dedicated to God, given special dignity; during the division, he received a double share of his father’s property, and during his father’s absence in the house, the “bekhor” was considered his representative (and even his own mother was subordinate to him). For this reason, “bekhorstvo” - in Russian this concept is not entirely accurately translated as “primogeniture” - was a coveted property: it is no coincidence that in the Old Testament, the forefather Jacob bought it from the original “bekhor” Esau (for the notorious lentil stew). The birthright of another Old Testament character, Reuben, passed to his brother Joseph as a result of a crime committed by Reuben. Consequently, primogeniture - bekhora(x) - is not a genealogical concept, but a legal one; it does not imply that the “bekhora” necessarily has younger brothers.

By the way, it is no coincidence that the Gospel emphasizes that Jesus was a “bechor.” Only the firstborn male baby was brought to the Temple of Jerusalem, where the mother’s cleansing sacrifice was performed, and the child himself was presented “before the face” of the Lord. According to this law, Jesus was brought to the Temple of Jerusalem: “...as it is prescribed in the law of the Lord, that every male child who opens the womb should be dedicated to the Lord...” (Luke 2:23). We remember this event on the feast of the Presentation.

Having said that, I think it is clear that neither calling Jesus the firstborn, nor mentioning that he had brothers and sisters against the background of the Jewish language and culture in any way contradicts the fact that he was the only son of the Virgin Mary. The Greek language in which the gospels were written was a means of reflecting another culture, so when it had to become a mirror for the culture of Palestine, it brought in some meanings of its own that could really be misleading. Accordingly, these meanings then passed into the Christian Slavic-Russian language, which was formed on the basis of Greek.

Chapter from the book by E. Vereshchagin “Modern biblical studies in a publicly accessible presentation.” M. Lada, 2013.

Health

From birth, those with a rare blood group are endowed with a strong immune system, which means they rarely get sick. It can be assumed that this is what makes them treat their health rather indifferently. These people are very bad patients; they do not like to follow the doctor's orders.

This is not Ikea: why you should love Soviet furniture

Corrosiveness: how to properly check the quality of autogas

NASA has come up with “eternal” bicycle tires that don’t need air

As a rule, such individuals are indifferent to alcohol. They extremely rarely develop bad habits, since they do not have a tendency towards self-destruction. These people are attracted to meditation, which helps them relax and develop their inner sense.

Jesus and Mary Magdalene

What do the scriptures say about this? Little is known about the woman’s life before she met Jesus, who her parents were, what family they were from. Of the disciples, only 12 were chosen by Christ as apostles, and he instructed them to bring the new covenant to people. But Christ revered Mary as the best student.

He told her many things that he did not trust in anyone. She completely believed him. This aroused feelings of envy among the other disciples, so they demanded that Mary be removed from Jesus’ circle.

While the other students ran away during the execution, she was present. She convinced everyone of the resurrection of Jesus. The role of Magdalene is more important than the 12 disciples. In the Orthodox faith she is considered Equal to the Apostles Mary Magdalene. After the death of Jesus, she went to John the Theologian and assisted in preaching.

The best article for you, go to: Who and when baptized Rus' - Orthodoxy

Main features

Those with the fourth blood group are distinguished by their spirituality and versatility, which is easily explained. It is assumed that they appeared thanks to unions of completely different personalities, combining sensitivity and irritability with stability and balance.

Some researchers suggest that the blood of the fourth group flowed in the veins of Jesus Christ himself. This version has not yet been confirmed. As evidence, they cite a test of blood found on the Shroud of Turin.

The Japanese doctor Mosahito Naomi spent twenty long years observing people with different blood groups, studying their character and the abilities of their behavior. Many years of research allowed him to come to certain conclusions. The scientist claims that those with a rare blood type are the most mystical and mysterious personalities, real philosophers.

LiveInternetLiveInternet

Family secrets of Christ. The descendants of the Savior became European kings. The formation of Christianity took many centuries after the preaching of Christ from Nazareth and his martyrdom on the cross. At first, Christian communities were too busy surviving to think seriously about the nuances of their faith. But as the church occupied a legal and then a dominant position in society, the problem of a single canonical teaching for all Christians became more and more pressing. And of great importance in this single teaching was the question of who, in fact, was Jesus the Man or God?

Throughout the 4th-6th centuries there were endless disputes, which are called Christological.
During them, priests and bishops tried to agree on who to consider the Savior - God, man or the God-man. But in the latter case, what nature is more important in it, Divine or human. It is extremely difficult to retell these theological intricacies. Moreover, Christians were never able to come to any single opinion. To this day, Catholics and Orthodox Christians have different views on the nature of Christ. And some other Eastern churches adhere to their own original interpretations. But this was not all that needed to be agreed upon. After all, there were many people around Christ, many of whom he was related to. It was necessary to understand whether Divine grace somehow extends to them, and if it does, then how and to whom exactly... And in general, can the God-man have earthly relatives?! Here it must be said that the favorite pastime of medieval people was compiling genealogies. After all, what kind of rights and property he could claim directly depended on what kind of family a person came from. The older the family, the more respect, privileges and opportunities. The more noble the relatives and ancestors, the stronger the authority. Of course, there were also those who hastened to write down in their genealogy certain names from the main book of medieval Europe - the Bible. At one time, for example, a theory was seriously developed according to which only a person whose family descended from one of the biblical patriarchs could be a king. True, they soon realized that it would turn out that all the crowned heads were Jews, the attitude towards whom was already extremely ambiguous. The royal genealogies were urgently rewritten, removing the ancient Jewish roots. However, from time to time there were impudent people who calmly listed Jesus Christ himself as their distant ancestors. When they were asked where such data came from and where the Savior even had children, they began to refer to some obscure treatises or apocrypha (versions of the Gospels not recognized by the church), of which there have always been a huge number. The situation with the relatives and descendants of Jesus threatened to develop into complete anarchy. The Church had to build a coherent and consistent system that everyone would accept once and for all. And this turned out to be a difficult task. Secrets of genealogy
for Jesus, as expected, drew a beautiful genealogy, according to which he, in full accordance with Old Testament prophecies, descended in a direct line from King David.
But a serious problem immediately became clear: the evangelists Matthew and Luke listed the Savior’s ancestors in completely different ways. Even the number of generations did not match. Hundreds of theologians, both in the West and in the East, struggled with how to bring them together. Various versions of the origin of the husband of the Holy Virgin Joseph were put forward, referring to the mistakes of translators... Already in quite late times, around the 16th century, a version arose among Protestants that these were generally two different genealogies. One refers to Joseph and the other to the Virgin Mary. It so happened that the spouses came from the same family, which guaranteed the fulfillment of the prophecy, but they were distantly related so that this did not interfere with the marriage. However, neither the Catholic, nor the Orthodox, nor even the Anglican Church recognized this version. They approached the origin and family ties of the Mother of God more carefully, because a lot depended on this. Mary was considered the daughter of Saint Anne and Saint Joachim (this was not mentioned in the main Gospels, and we had to rely on the apocrypha). Based on this, John the Baptist (or Baptist) turned out to be Christ’s second cousin, like the author of the Apocalypse John the Theologian. In total, Jesus had about two dozen relatives in this scheme, but all of them were distant enough that this did not appear to be an encroachment on the concept of God-humanity. However, there were much more serious problems. These are the “brothers of the Lord” mentioned in the Gospels. They were named (Simeon, Judah, Jacob and Josiah), so it was impossible to simply ignore their existence. However, the idea that the Virgin Mary, after the immaculate conception, could give birth to several children naturally did not suit the church fathers much. Although some communities easily accepted this concept, reasoning that, having fulfilled her mission, Mary had the right to live an ordinary human life. However, the largest churches, Catholic and Orthodox, rejected this version. According to the Orthodox, the so-called “brothers of the Lord” are the children of Joseph the Betrothed, born from Saint Joachim (mainly his first wife, before his marriage to Mary. It is believed that he had four sons and two daughters. Catholics believe that this cousins, however, did not come to a consensus on which side - the father or mother. The Immaculate Conception
Many copies were broken around the Virgin Mary herself. For example, the popular theologian from Antioch in the 5th century, Bishop Nestorius, insisted that she should not be call the Mother of God. After all, a human being cannot give birth to God, just as the lesser cannot contain the greater. According to Nestorius, Mary was only the Mother of Christ, and all the Divine was breathed into the baby directly by God the Father. Nestorius’s teaching was ultimately condemned, although it was not the most radical. He, at least, recognized the Divine nature of Christ from the moment of conception. And a whole galaxy of early Christian preachers, united under the name adoptionists, argued that Christ was adopted by God only after baptism by John the Baptist.
And before that he was the most ordinary person, born of an ordinary woman, Maria. One way or another, gradually the dogmas about the Immaculate Conception of Christ and the holiness of the Mother of God were formulated and proclaimed by all the major churches. True, this was not enough for Catholics, and they added the dogma of the Immaculate Conception and the Virgin Mary herself. Her mother, Saint Anne, was married for 50 years and was barren. Then an angel appeared to her and her husband and announced an impending miracle. Soon they had a daughter, Mary, who was born in the usual way, but did not have the original sin that lies with all the descendants of Adam and Eve. It is interesting that until the 17th century, the Catholic Church condemned and prohibited all such stories. Then she stopped prohibiting it. And in the 19th century, Pope Pius IX approved the dogma, and those books that denied it began to be banned. At the same time, there was a slight discord within the church - it was officially believed that Mary was conceived, albeit after the angel’s message, but in the most ordinary way, like all people. But the doctrine of the Franciscan Order insisted that the conception was unusual and sinless. It allegedly happened as a result of a simple hug between the spouses. Well, the Orthodox Church, from the very beginning, denied such views, and continues to insist that, despite all the merits of the Virgin Mary, she still had original sin. Who created the Priory of Sion?
Discussions that had died out that the Savior was married and left offspring flared up with renewed vigor in the 20th century.
Perhaps the most famous work on this topic is the book “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail,” published in 1982. She was far from the first, but she presented the material most consistently and fully. And besides, it was this work that stimulated the imagination of the fiction writer Dan Brown and Hollywood filmmakers, who brought sensational assumptions to the general public. By the way, the authors of “Holy Blood...” even tried to sue Brown, but lost. According to the authors of “The Holy Blood...” and their supporters, the wife of Jesus Christ was Mary Magdalene. The episodes when Mary Magdalene washes Jesus' feet and wipes them with her own hair, as well as the famous miracle in Cana of Galilee, when water turned into wine, are interpreted as a description of the marriage ceremony. They also argue that an unmarried man in Ancient Judea simply could not be perceived as a teacher. This marriage allegedly left children who later founded the first dynasty of Frankish kings - the Merovingians. Kings from this dynasty ruled large parts of Europe until the 8th century, when power passed to the Carolingians. However, supporters of the version about the descendants of Christ argue that in fact, the same “holy blood” flowed in the veins of the Carolingians. And then - in the veins of the Habsburgs and other great dynasties (including the Russian Romanovs). Thus, power over the Old World was held in the hands of the descendants of the Savior. Well, the notorious Holy Grail is not a cup at all, but the womb of Mary, from which emerged the great dynasty of Christ’s descendants. The protection of this sacred power was carried out by a mysterious organization called the Priory of Sion, created back in the 11th century by the leader of the First Crusade, Godfrey of Bouillon (who, by the way, was actually related to the Merovingians through the female line). Then the Templar Order separated from the Priory, but the organization continued to continuously fulfill its duty until the present day. Moreover, its masters included such people as Leonardo da Vinci, Isaac Newton, Victor Hugo and Jean Cocteau. The most interesting thing is that the Priory of Sion is a real organization. But it was created not in the 11th century, but in 1956. It was founded by the notorious French adventurer and hoaxer Pierre Plantard. He actually claimed to be a direct descendant of the Merovingians and at the same time as this "great monarch" predicted by Nostradamus. Plantard read and praised the book “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail,” but emphasized that he never claimed any relationship with Jesus Christ, and the authors’ theses seem dubious to him. Still would! After all, as sources for their “investigation” they used several fake pseudo-medieval documents produced by Plantard! Wife and Disciple
A new surge of interest in the topic of the possible marriage of Jesus occurred recently when a report was read at an international congress under the modest title “Fragment of the New Coptic Gospel.”
We were talking about a manuscript that had been known since the 1980s, but was carefully studied and fully translated only in 2010. In the text of eight lines in the Said dialect of the Coptic language, scientists were able to make out only fragments of phrases. But what kind! The following fragment caused the greatest furor: “Jesus said to them: “My wife...” The text also mentions the mother of Jesus and another Mary, about whom it is said: “... may be my disciple.” True, it is not entirely clear whether Christ or someone else is saying this. Scientists evaluate the results obtained very carefully. Judging by the handwriting, the papyrus entry was made in the 4th century. The text was clearly written somewhere a century and a half after the life of Jesus. So even if all the phrases are read correctly, they only mean that some communities of early Christians may have believed that Christ had a wife and wrote texts about it. After all, the moment when a unified doctrine would be created was still far away. Nevertheless, the papyrus, which was instantly dubbed the “Gospel of the Wife of Jesus,” created a real sensation. Tests carried out in 2014 showed that the ink on it was clearly ancient and was not made in modern times. But already in 2016, information appeared that, after all, the scandalous “Gospel...” could turn out to be a high-quality fake. But who could have done it? And most importantly - why? Perhaps someone really knows the truth about Christ's family secrets and is trying to communicate it in such an extravagant way? Or vice versa - a prudent businessman is stirring up interest before the release of the next sensational blockbuster? Magazine: Mysteries of History No. 52, Victor Banev
Source: https://salik.biz Source: https://salik.biz/articles/47709-semeinye-tainy-hr...li-evropeiskimi-koroljami.html

Possible problems

It cannot be said that everything always goes smoothly in the lives of those with a rare blood type. Indecisiveness is a flaw that many of them have. It is very difficult for such people to make choices, especially when it comes to really important things.

It is also worth paying attention to the fact that these individuals really do not like to enter into conflicts. Therefore, they often refuse the opportunity to defend their opinion and willingly give in to others so as not to spoil their relationships with them. Surprisingly, this does not prevent them from being in constant internal conflict, fighting with themselves. Such experiences have an extremely negative impact on self-esteem.

Those with the fourth blood group have difficulty finding a mate. It is difficult for men to make up their minds because they are amorous; they constantly want novelty and adventure. Women place too high demands on the opposite sex. Often they fail to find someone who matches them, which forces them to remain alone and continue searching for their ideal all their lives.

Did Mary Magdalene have children with Jesus Christ?

Mary Magdalene is rightfully considered the most mysterious character in the New Testament. We know nothing about her childhood, her parents, or her loved ones.

We know nothing about her life either. In any case, none of the four Gospels can tell us how this woman lived after the execution of Jesus Christ. ..

When there is little information, they make it up. The Fathers of the Church also had to think about this information when the question arose: to make the aforementioned Mary a saint or not?

Since Mary Magdalene was the first to behold the risen Christ, it was difficult to get rid of this character. And she was canonized, but... under special conditions - by attributing to the unfortunate woman actions and deeds that she had never committed! In the church understanding, the holiness of Magdalene was expressed in the fact that she turned from a great sinner into a great righteous woman.

Scrolls from Nag Hammadi. A Coptic theologian claimed that Jesus often kissed Mary of Magdala on the lips and considered her his favorite disciple

One and a half thousand years have passed, and modern researchers of Magdalene’s life did exactly the opposite with her: they made a great sinner out of a great righteous woman and declared that this was wonderful. Who exactly was this extraordinary woman?

Entity multiplication

Mary first appears in the Bible when Jesus cast out seven demons from her. Having been healed, the woman followed the Savior and became one of His admirers.

Mary of Magdala was a wealthy woman; she willingly took on Jesus' expenses. When Jesus was captured and sentenced to death, she was present at the execution along with two other Marys - the mother of Christ and the sister of Lazarus. She participated in the burial of Jesus and anointed His dead body with Myrrh.

It was she who came to the cave where Jesus was buried and discovered that His body had disappeared. And it was she who first saw the risen Christ and told the apostles about him. It was also mentioned that she visited Rome, where she also spoke about Christ.

Nothing more can be extracted from the New Testament. But besides the four canonical Gospels, there are several that are not recognized by the church, that is, non-canonical. These Gospels were rejected by the church because of their Gnostic (teachings hostile to Christianity) origin and content.

In the first centuries, when Christianity had not yet formed into a world religion, some Christians shared the views of the Gnostics, who affirmed the knowability of God and the possibility of acquisition by any person through knowledge of the divine essence. In the Gnostic Gospels, Mary of Magdala was given a very important role. She was considered the beloved and most faithful disciple of Christ. Mary herself was the author of one of the Gospels - the Gospel of Mary Magdalene.

Judging by this text, Mary of Magdala was most interested in the question of posthumous transformations of the soul. It is not for nothing that the non-canonical Gospels claimed that this woman became the founder of a philosophical Christian community and her own church. Of course, official Christianity smeared these Gospels as dangerous and incorrect. And it offered a completely different image of Mary of Magdala.

From student to student

It didn’t take much effort to turn a faithful student into a representative of the first ancient profession. It was only necessary to unite with Mary of Magdala all the women mentioned but not named in the New Testament.

The first candidate to complete the image of Magdalene was the woman who washed Christ’s feet with myrrh and wiped them with her hair. Another candidate is the woman who anointed Christ's hair. The third is the harlot whom Jesus saved from stoning and who followed him. As a result, unnamed women easily turned into the already famous Mary of Magdala.

The image of the improved Mary became like this: before, she walked around with a painted face and loose hair and engaged in prostitution, but Jesus saved her from death, cast out demons from her, which should be understood as vices, and Mary became a virtuous and faithful companion of the apostles.

Somewhere in the background of the Gospels she was with Susanna, Joanna and Salome. Only the mother of Jesus, in view of her complete purity and inspiration of God, was allowed to take a place next to Jesus, and only because He was her son.

Orthodox Christians had a simple attitude towards women: they were all daughters of Eve, who succumbed to temptation in paradise and thus burdened humanity with original sin. Mary of Magdala simply repeated the path of Eve, but in the opposite direction - she was cleansed from sin by her faith. And when Christians in the fifth century appeared Saint Mary of Egypt, who in her earthly life actually engaged in fornication, but repented, the image of Magdalene was completed. They say she is a harlot and nothing else.

The kiss that offended the apostles?

Centuries have passed. In 1945, famous scrolls written in Coptic were found in Nag Hammadi, Egypt. These were the same texts not recognized by the church that miraculously survived the period of struggle against heresies. Here it was unexpectedly revealed that Jesus called Mary of Magdala his beloved disciple and often kissed her on the lips.

And the other disciples were very jealous of Christ and even demanded an explanation from him why he singled out this Mary to the detriment of the others. Jesus answered this allegorically and evasively. Modern researchers immediately had a nasty suspicion that Jesus did not kiss Mary of Magdala as a disciple...

Mary Magdalene embraces the cross on which the Savior was crucified. She could not hug Jesus during life, but she could after death. In all the paintings and icons, she worries about the death of the Savior more than any of the apostles

Researchers were quick to note that Jesus did not just kiss Mary, but often on the lips. The peculiarity of such kisses in the 20th century was clear as day. There were two options why Jesus kissed Mary on the lips - either He lived with his disciple in sin, or He was simply married to her.

The sinful relationship somehow denigrated the name of Jesus. Well, Jesus having a wife did not contradict the Jewish laws of that time; on the contrary, a man of Jesus’ age was simply obliged to have a wife! But while in the sixth century it was possible to turn Magdalene into a harlot based on the text, in the twentieth century it was no longer possible to turn Jesus into a married man. More than one generation of theologians has worked on the purity and integrity of His image!

So He couldn’t have any wife, because He wasn’t supposed to. And the question of why Jesus kissed Mary Magdalene on the lips began to be answered with murderous logic: because in the first century it was customary among Christians to kiss each other on the lips. But the essence of the question still eluded those who answered: why then did Jesus do this so often that the other disciples were offended and indignant?

Mother of Jesus' Heirs

And then a revelation appeared from British historians and archaeologists Baigent, Ley and Lincoln, “The Sacred Riddle,” where Magdalene was declared not only the companion, disciple and wife of Jesus Christ, but also the mother of His children.

In general, there is nothing surprising in the existence of children of a married man. If, of course, it weren’t for the man’s name. But in early Christian times, such versions existed safely. Let's say that some features of the knightly era are to blame for this. Even the name of Mary Magdalene was deciphered as “Mary of the city of Magdal-El,” which in turn was simply translated as “Mary of the city with towers.” Images of Mary from Magdala were readily complemented by the turret in the background.

In that wonderful era, apocryphal (hagiographical) texts appeared that depicted Magdalene’s life as follows. She was the spiritual wife of Jesus and through the virgin birth gave birth to his son Joseph the Sweetest

. This baby became the ancestor of the royal house of the Merovingians. To save the child, Magdalene had to flee to Marseille. But soon her earthly life ended, and Jesus took her to heaven in the Bridal Chamber.

There is another legend. According to her, Magdalene had two children

- boy and girl: Joseph and Sofia. Magdalene lived to a ripe old age and was buried in the south of France.

Although Magdalene is mentioned only 13 times in the New Testament, after she was declared a saint, holy relics of Magdalene also appeared. Bones, hair, coffin chips and even blood. There was a desperate struggle for the relics of Magdalene, and in the eleventh century there was even a period that historians call the “Magdalene ferment”!

Mary Magdalene was worshiped not only by the Albigensian heretics, but also by the Knights Templar. It is not for nothing that the knightly Baphomet personified the “baby Magdalene” Sophia, that is, Wisdom. But already in the Renaissance, the image of the repentant Magdalene became the favorite image of artists. As the time goes, so do the images and relics. Nikolay KOTOMKIN “Mysteries of History” November 2012